Lex Answers
Yeah. I like the push. I'm too easy on myself most times.
I realised that Card College was important on the larger scale, but my immediate meeds were much smaller. It would have been ridiculous to try and work through even one book in a month, given my limited experience. And so I'm focusing instead on having a solid show for March when I'll be visiting some friends so I can perform for them the best I can.
Very true. It's not perfection that was the prime motivator I would say, but rather ego protection. Having had very minimal understanding of magic before this month, when I started to actually research and know more about magic, it's history, the theories, and performers, I was taken aback. The model of the magic world that I had was so small and ignorant. It's disheartening to look up to your older sister as the
most amazing tennis player in the world only to realise that she's not a pro and there's an even higher level above her. Even worse when it's personal, and instead of the small pond you were in you find yourself in a lake with numerous more species competing for the same food sources as you. Little koi cannot fight Loch Ness, I think.
And so there has to be that amount of recklessness and risk. There are a lot of mistakes that you can keep personal and not need to learn in public, but if you stay inside all your life and never perform because of some unknown factor, well, where's the fun in that? I think the most amazing part in magic is it enabling you to connect with other human beings in a very specific and fundamental way. Instead of the usual discord of everyday life, you have something special shared. And that creates an immediate, disturbing, and revitalising bond, momentary as it may be. That is the beauty in magic, or any art for that matter.
As for the line between practice and performance, that is something that every individual needs to determine for himself or herself. You can perform regularly, making plenty of mistakes and failing so hard sometimes that you cry, yet always moving and improving and creating and evolving. Or you can practice indefinitely, learning every nuance and detail and seeing the contrast between how well you move and how the masters before you have moved and being faced with a mountain of a gap, or the even worse mediocre and humdrum performances of everyday ignoramus only getting away because of polite spectators and drunkenness—yet you are always refining and excising the fat.
To stay in one extreme is to be alone, having few equals and rivals. Shunning, and being shunned by most. Yet being a beautiful and unique snowflake, a diamond in the rough very few will ever understand. Or you can choose to be in the middle. A dynamic and static being, ever changing and evolving thing. Here there is no security, no safety, for what might be beautiful one night will be corrupted the next. You will change and grow much, as a person and a performer, and you will want scream for joy on ecstatic nights, and cry to sleep tearing your hair out in times of despair. Neither choice is better than the other. The only question is, what do you want for yourself?
Fail. Fail. Fail. Win. Fail. Fail. Fail. Mediocrity. Fail. Win. Win. Fail.
It goes on. But it's the people that stick to one thing enough that become the bright shining stars. I'm still working on this, and I still want to keep on going. But one day, I might not want to be a magi any longer. To be honest, I don't want to step into a door yet. I want to taste the richness of many arts and many disciplines and learn and drink from all the fountains of life. As long as I'm in anything though, I'm going to do my best to throw myself headfirst into those failures and not spare anything in the pursuit of being only the best.
I hesitate a lot, in taking those falls, but I'm working on it. It's a process, and I'm enjoying it babe.
Again, these aren't off the mark. Thank you for your concern and involvement with this. It's very helpful, and it lights up my path along the way. You've been spot on about everything so far. Thank you.
I've been thinking about this, and I realise that it's a lot harder without the magic. Because then you are walking up to complete strangers and connecting with them based only on...who you are. There's no sleights and patter and a stage to hide behind. I think that take the magic away from most of those that call themselves magicians and you'll find an inadequate social being. Myself included.
It's a good idea though, to work on just talking to people. I'll be going out this weekend with some friends and I'll not be bringing any cards. My only goal is to talk to as many new people as possible and make new friends. It should be easier with friends beside me, but that's another barrier I'll be using. Oh well. Little steps at a time.
You bring up the word rapport, and that's exactly what happened here. I assumed a rapport that I didn't have, which though it's worked before, did not at this time. There was very little investment in the audience at the time. I was some guy that walked up to them and asked if they wanted to see magic. There was no hook, no chase. It was handed to them on a silver platter, and so they could have cared less about it. Now, had I been able to first draw intrigue and interest, vesting their attention into the performance, the line would have been funny. We were on different levels though, and so it didn't work.
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, Badger.
Looks like you've had a rough couple of days, and are in the process of recalibrating what you expect out of this process. That's totally cool--if you didn't do a little check partway through, I'd be worried.
But I will push you a little bit on parts of it.![]()
Yeah. I like the push. I'm too easy on myself most times.
1. Why give up on Giobbi? You had a pretty good reason for why you wanted to work through Card College methodically. Are those reasons wrong or less pertinent now? (Honest question, not rhetorical. "I was wrong" or "things changed" is a perfectly good response.) Has something changed that warrants the change in your practice?
I realised that Card College was important on the larger scale, but my immediate meeds were much smaller. It would have been ridiculous to try and work through even one book in a month, given my limited experience. And so I'm focusing instead on having a solid show for March when I'll be visiting some friends so I can perform for them the best I can.
2. Why settle only for perfection in performance? Nobody is David Blaine on their first outing. Heck, on their 250th. If one waits to perform only the perfect routine, one will probably never perform. (Yes, high standards can be a form of procrastination too. I have a feeling that the episode in the Starbuck's might fit this bill?)
Anne Lamott's book on writing, Bird By Bird, has a whole chapter on "sh[!++]y first drafts." I'd wager everything she says about writing might also apply to this situation. The upshot is that sometimes you need to go out and do it even though you know it's going to suck. I would go so far as to say because you know it's going to suck. The only way to know how to fix it is to do it, fail, and figure out what went wrong.
Very true. It's not perfection that was the prime motivator I would say, but rather ego protection. Having had very minimal understanding of magic before this month, when I started to actually research and know more about magic, it's history, the theories, and performers, I was taken aback. The model of the magic world that I had was so small and ignorant. It's disheartening to look up to your older sister as the
most amazing tennis player in the world only to realise that she's not a pro and there's an even higher level above her. Even worse when it's personal, and instead of the small pond you were in you find yourself in a lake with numerous more species competing for the same food sources as you. Little koi cannot fight Loch Ness, I think.
And so there has to be that amount of recklessness and risk. There are a lot of mistakes that you can keep personal and not need to learn in public, but if you stay inside all your life and never perform because of some unknown factor, well, where's the fun in that? I think the most amazing part in magic is it enabling you to connect with other human beings in a very specific and fundamental way. Instead of the usual discord of everyday life, you have something special shared. And that creates an immediate, disturbing, and revitalising bond, momentary as it may be. That is the beauty in magic, or any art for that matter.
As for the line between practice and performance, that is something that every individual needs to determine for himself or herself. You can perform regularly, making plenty of mistakes and failing so hard sometimes that you cry, yet always moving and improving and creating and evolving. Or you can practice indefinitely, learning every nuance and detail and seeing the contrast between how well you move and how the masters before you have moved and being faced with a mountain of a gap, or the even worse mediocre and humdrum performances of everyday ignoramus only getting away because of polite spectators and drunkenness—yet you are always refining and excising the fat.
To stay in one extreme is to be alone, having few equals and rivals. Shunning, and being shunned by most. Yet being a beautiful and unique snowflake, a diamond in the rough very few will ever understand. Or you can choose to be in the middle. A dynamic and static being, ever changing and evolving thing. Here there is no security, no safety, for what might be beautiful one night will be corrupted the next. You will change and grow much, as a person and a performer, and you will want scream for joy on ecstatic nights, and cry to sleep tearing your hair out in times of despair. Neither choice is better than the other. The only question is, what do you want for yourself?
3. Which leads to one final observation. Magic--as I understand it anyway--used to be an apprenticeship deal. Even now, I would not be surprised at all if there is a lot of talk of "paying your dues" in order to get into the industry. Although I am not terribly familiar with the phenomenon in magic, I am familiar with it in other areas.
In my experience, the most common coin in which one "pays ones dues" is failure. Work, service, and study are others, but failure is one of the most prominent. In many fields, there isn't much respect for people who have never tasted failure--and much respect for people who learn from their mistakes and grow from them.
But ya can't grow from your mistakes if ya never let yourself make any.
My apologies if these are off the mark--I might be reading way too much into the last couple of posts.But I noticed a change in the way you were talking about your regimen, and I thought this might be something worth saying.
Fail. Fail. Fail. Win. Fail. Fail. Fail. Mediocrity. Fail. Win. Win. Fail.
It goes on. But it's the people that stick to one thing enough that become the bright shining stars. I'm still working on this, and I still want to keep on going. But one day, I might not want to be a magi any longer. To be honest, I don't want to step into a door yet. I want to taste the richness of many arts and many disciplines and learn and drink from all the fountains of life. As long as I'm in anything though, I'm going to do my best to throw myself headfirst into those failures and not spare anything in the pursuit of being only the best.
I hesitate a lot, in taking those falls, but I'm working on it. It's a process, and I'm enjoying it babe.
Again, these aren't off the mark. Thank you for your concern and involvement with this. It's very helpful, and it lights up my path along the way. You've been spot on about everything so far. Thank you.
Good for you for going out and doing it. It's also great that you're taking the time to think through what happened rather than just chalking it up to "I sucked" or "dumb audience." It's usually more complex than that.
I think you got a real nugget of wisdom there: Context Matters.
Where would you have a chance just to chat and hang out with folks who are generally your age and your "type"? Maybe just sit and shoot the breeze for a while before playing the "magician" card? Approaching folks with that first can be a little bit like walking into a singles bar with your zipper down: people will make assumptions about what you're up to even if it was an accident.
I've been thinking about this, and I realise that it's a lot harder without the magic. Because then you are walking up to complete strangers and connecting with them based only on...who you are. There's no sleights and patter and a stage to hide behind. I think that take the magic away from most of those that call themselves magicians and you'll find an inadequate social being. Myself included.
It's a good idea though, to work on just talking to people. I'll be going out this weekend with some friends and I'll not be bringing any cards. My only goal is to talk to as many new people as possible and make new friends. It should be easier with friends beside me, but that's another barrier I'll be using. Oh well. Little steps at a time.
About the "attention whore" gambit: not a bad idea, but risky early on. Audiences, in my experience (in fields other than magic), aren't that interested in watching a performer who just wants to be watched. Especially at the very beginning, it seems to me the performer should make it clear that there's something in it for the audience. (Do we not call this "the Pledge"?)
That might be more easily done if you've already established a rapport with the prospective audience--and they'll then have a context. "Yeah, this is my new bud Aloysius, and he likes fiddling with cards. I wonder why? Maybe I'll ask."
You bring up the word rapport, and that's exactly what happened here. I assumed a rapport that I didn't have, which though it's worked before, did not at this time. There was very little investment in the audience at the time. I was some guy that walked up to them and asked if they wanted to see magic. There was no hook, no chase. It was handed to them on a silver platter, and so they could have cared less about it. Now, had I been able to first draw intrigue and interest, vesting their attention into the performance, the line would have been funny. We were on different levels though, and so it didn't work.