Daniel Madison's Change refilmed

[adjones]

its either editing or a gimmick.

I would have to agree. It would be very hard to use sleight of hand when none of your fingers move during the change.

 

[Randomwrath]

I give up, I'm stumped. If it's a gimmick, I dunno how it works. If it isn't, I'm even more lost.

 

[bentley]

Daniel Madison says there is no gimmicks so I will trust him but we will have to find out in 2009. I like it and can't wait for it.

 

[Medifro]

It can be done with a gimmick that has been around for quite some time, and it produces a crease.

What I don't like about this, is the overall atitude:
"injecting more and more controversy into existing theories of the flawless colour change."

This is the perfect hype ... Best part in video is "caused contorversy in magic", I really doubt that it caused any contorversy but in this part of magic community.

Its a great looking change and no one can argue, but the overall feel of this is marketing a trick, the hype and the over-zealous thing, I find it quite annoying.

Cheers,

 

[Huruey]

If this really is a flawless color change, why then did he bother putting a different color change in Dangerous?

Huruey

 

[remy]

If this really is a flawless color change, why then did he bother putting a different color change in Dangerous?

Huruey

I'd say because if it is the said "flawless" color change, then it would deserve it's own DVD or whatever.

Remy

 

[copperfield 14]

If this really is a flawless color change, why then did he bother putting a different color change in Dangerous?

Huruey

well you can't have more than one creation. Also I heard that change will be in a dvd with 6 other changes.

 

[Tim Jahn]

well you can't have more than one creation. Also I heard that change will be in a dvd with 6 other changes.

Cool!!! Will it come with the gimmick? Lol.

 

[bentley]

I don't know what to believe about Change but it is awesome.