Hi all, I was searching but couldnt find a debate between these two decks, I just wanted to know how different these two decks were handling wise and feel?
Thanks,
Mat
Thanks,
Mat
Template errors
- Template public:font_awesome_setup: [E_USER_WARNING] Template public:font_awesome_setup is unknown (src/XF/Template/Templater.php:781)
- Template public:page_style: [E_WARNING] A non-numeric value encountered (/srv/private/xenforo/internal_data/code_cache/templates/l1/s8/public/page_style.php:101)
- Template public:page_style: [E_WARNING] A non-numeric value encountered (/srv/private/xenforo/internal_data/code_cache/templates/l1/s8/public/page_style.php:155)
- Template public:uix_config: [E_WARNING] A non-numeric value encountered (/srv/private/xenforo/internal_data/code_cache/templates/l1/s8/public/uix_config.php:31)
- Template public:uix_config: [E_WARNING] A non-numeric value encountered (/srv/private/xenforo/internal_data/code_cache/templates/l1/s8/public/uix_config.php:32)
Aviator Vs Aladdin 1001 Smooth
- Thread starter MKulik
- Start date
The new Aladdins (Erlanger), clump easier, straight out of the box, even. And Almost impossible to get a good fan. Aviator stock is thinner than Aladdins and feel identical ( I believe they both have smooth finish ) and handle better than the new Bicycle standards and in my opinion handle much better than the new Erlanger Aladdins. Unless you can find the older version(Cincinatti) Aladdins, I reccomend Aviators. But it's your choice.