Template errors

  • Template public:font_awesome_setup: [E_USER_WARNING] Template public:font_awesome_setup is unknown (src/XF/Template/Templater.php:781)
  • Template public:page_style: [E_WARNING] A non-numeric value encountered (/srv/private/xenforo/internal_data/code_cache/templates/l1/s8/public/page_style.php:101)
  • Template public:page_style: [E_WARNING] A non-numeric value encountered (/srv/private/xenforo/internal_data/code_cache/templates/l1/s8/public/page_style.php:155)
  • Template public:uix_config: [E_WARNING] A non-numeric value encountered (/srv/private/xenforo/internal_data/code_cache/templates/l1/s8/public/uix_config.php:31)
  • Template public:uix_config: [E_WARNING] A non-numeric value encountered (/srv/private/xenforo/internal_data/code_cache/templates/l1/s8/public/uix_config.php:32)

Which is better - thick card stock or thin card stock?

Thick or thin card stock?

  • Thick

    Votes: 13 31.7%
  • Thin

    Votes: 28 68.3%

  • Total voters
    41

EJ

Mar 4, 2008
246
0
36
Canada
Well, if you give me a deck of cards that will hold together for ever but are thin, then I am in heaven. But thick cards are hard to work with so I personally like thins.
I agree. I too find thick cards hard to work with.
 
Mar 30, 2008
101
0
Hmmm....It depends on what you do. I like cards that are a thinner stock when it comes to flourishing since the packets are smaller but there are just as many cards. If someone can find me a deck of cards like the Absolut Vodka decks that fans like a Centurion, I am in heaven.
 
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results