For our finals we were asked to present our synthesis essay on an array of subjects.
I chose Fat taxes and obesity.
As I discuss and make my points in the topic I am choosing to do some effects to use as visual aids and representations of my discussion.For example, on taxing soda I have prepared a version of healed and sealed to illustrate obsession over sugary drinks.Does anyone have anymore presentational ideas or effects I could use for this type of discussion?
Here is a rough draft of what I have on my essay so far so you can get an idea of how I can go about this. The professor specifically wanted a creativity presentation, he shows disdain in power points or simple speaking.
No other country has had such high obesity rates increase in the past few generations than in the US. Its a problem with many arguments and options being thrown out to help “solve” it. Food taxes, banning junk foods from food stamps, and some say to simply inspire people to eat healthy but not actually work at it. Out of all of this, the two main points are should the government tax high calorie-high sugar foods? And the other is should we even want the government involved in something that is, to some, personal responsibilities? My contention is that we should definitely allow responsibility to be held by the government on the health of its people but limit the power that it can take over food production.
Radley Balko, author of “What you eat is your business”, says that prohibiting vending machines in schools, funding new bike trails and sidewalks, restricting food marketing to children, is an invasion of government into our own personal eating lifestyle. But if the government was not already nose deep into what the american people eat, then why do we have lobbyists from kellogs, reese’s, burger king, etc. sitting in congress? Clearly the government already has a say in what we eat and what food is advertised to us so Mr. balko’s argument is null. Since 1990, obesity has increased from a scant 10% in some states to a whopper sized 30% to 35% in onver 15 states. Counting the obesity rate in the rest of our states we are looking at ⅔ of a nation that is overweight and/or obese. if ⅔ doesn’t scare you, that means 60 million people since 2006. That was only about 5 years ago. Balko expresses that people who are trying to condemn places like McDonalds, Coca-cola, chips and soda at schools are being unconstitutional and taking away our rights as americans. And I would argue this myself but Michael pollan says it best in his essay Attacks on the Food Police “When a journalist writes critically of the cooking or marketing practices at McDonald’s, he is somehow interfering with people’s freedom to enjoy their chicken nuggets — the journalist stands for control. Yet for some reason the hundreds of millions of dollars spent by McDonald’s to market its food represents not control but freedom. Keep in mind that this marketing involves the routine manipulation of children — bribing them with toys, enticing them to eat more with cleverly designed packaging and portion sizes, and deploying the arts of food science to exploit their inborn cravings for fat, salt and sugar. So who exactly is the more “controlling” party here?”.
I chose Fat taxes and obesity.
As I discuss and make my points in the topic I am choosing to do some effects to use as visual aids and representations of my discussion.For example, on taxing soda I have prepared a version of healed and sealed to illustrate obsession over sugary drinks.Does anyone have anymore presentational ideas or effects I could use for this type of discussion?
Here is a rough draft of what I have on my essay so far so you can get an idea of how I can go about this. The professor specifically wanted a creativity presentation, he shows disdain in power points or simple speaking.
No other country has had such high obesity rates increase in the past few generations than in the US. Its a problem with many arguments and options being thrown out to help “solve” it. Food taxes, banning junk foods from food stamps, and some say to simply inspire people to eat healthy but not actually work at it. Out of all of this, the two main points are should the government tax high calorie-high sugar foods? And the other is should we even want the government involved in something that is, to some, personal responsibilities? My contention is that we should definitely allow responsibility to be held by the government on the health of its people but limit the power that it can take over food production.
Radley Balko, author of “What you eat is your business”, says that prohibiting vending machines in schools, funding new bike trails and sidewalks, restricting food marketing to children, is an invasion of government into our own personal eating lifestyle. But if the government was not already nose deep into what the american people eat, then why do we have lobbyists from kellogs, reese’s, burger king, etc. sitting in congress? Clearly the government already has a say in what we eat and what food is advertised to us so Mr. balko’s argument is null. Since 1990, obesity has increased from a scant 10% in some states to a whopper sized 30% to 35% in onver 15 states. Counting the obesity rate in the rest of our states we are looking at ⅔ of a nation that is overweight and/or obese. if ⅔ doesn’t scare you, that means 60 million people since 2006. That was only about 5 years ago. Balko expresses that people who are trying to condemn places like McDonalds, Coca-cola, chips and soda at schools are being unconstitutional and taking away our rights as americans. And I would argue this myself but Michael pollan says it best in his essay Attacks on the Food Police “When a journalist writes critically of the cooking or marketing practices at McDonald’s, he is somehow interfering with people’s freedom to enjoy their chicken nuggets — the journalist stands for control. Yet for some reason the hundreds of millions of dollars spent by McDonald’s to market its food represents not control but freedom. Keep in mind that this marketing involves the routine manipulation of children — bribing them with toys, enticing them to eat more with cleverly designed packaging and portion sizes, and deploying the arts of food science to exploit their inborn cravings for fat, salt and sugar. So who exactly is the more “controlling” party here?”.