Advanced Sleights 1-on-1's

[Dr.Nick]

I'd actually really like to see some sleight of hand magic using ordinary objects (pens, cigarettes, balls, paperclips, matches etc). More stuff like Missing Link.

Same here.

 

[Guitarkid2023]

Some of those ideas are a little weak. (there are some good ones though)

For instance, the one handed top palm, or the top change. Those are such simple moves. And it wouldn't be useful. The only way things like this would work is if they combined some. Such as something like a 'card switch' 1 on 1. It would consist of 2 or 3 versatile card switches, (i.e. top change, bottom change, second dealing, bottom dealing, etc.)

The same goes for all of the other basic moves. They're just too small. It would be like teaching a push over break in a 1 on 1.

Don't get me wrong though, I love the thinking.

-Kevin

 

[Ben Long]

A lot of you guys are suggesting things that can't happen. T11 won't teach a Paul Harris trick, or the Cascade Control. those are moves by other people, that imo shouldn't be taught by anyone else. If a move is already published, whats the point in teaching it again? (coughmattrichmancough) I understand things like Erdnase material because thats like over 100 years old, and no one knows who S.W. Erdnase is. But why teach a control that isn't yours, and the creator is known?

For the coin thing, why not just pick up bobo's? It's hands down the best book to start with for coins.


I would like to see some new material from Dan and Dave. They've hardly released anything here. I would also like to see some on audience control, confidence, etc. These guys have been performing forever, I'm sure they'd be able to give us some gems for performing.

Yes, I am perfectly aware of ethical issues with material that is already published, but as I have said before, this is my dream list of 1-on-1's. If I could even get a fraction of these, I'd be happy.

As far as getting Modern Coin Magic, I have it, but would love to see some of the artists teach things that they're good at. In my view, that's the point of 1-on-1.